To help
the reader gain insight to the point of this post, I need to explain what a
‘line read’ is for our non-theatrical folks. A ‘line read’ is when a director
gives an actor a specific way of saying a line – usually because the actor is
not saying the way the director wants - or the actor just doesn’t 'get' the way
the line needs to be delivered. Either way, this leaves little or no scope for
the actor to find her own way - and from my experience it generally ends up
sounding inauthentic.
If we
look at this ‘line read’ concept in terms of fight choreography, often a fight
director will do a move for an actor (in order to demonstrate). We could therefore say a fight director
is giving a ‘physical read’ of the choreography. I have witnessed many fight
directors show off the moves they give their actors!
This
brings me to the point of this post. I think as fight directors, we need to be
careful with ‘physical reads’. My observation is that an actor usually tries to
emulate the move the fight director has done and the negative affect is this:
the actor usually has crafted (or by accident) a particular shape / skeletal structure for a
character, even if no strong physical characterization has taken place. So an
audience will have that shape in their mind’s eye, consciously or not. When the
actor comes to the moment or moments where they have simply copied the fight
director, there is a distinct shift in shape.
As a
fight director, I will usually do one of two things: move like the actor,
or do it a little 'bad'. The logic of dumbing down the move (ie doing it a little badly) is that I want the
actor to think, "I don’t want to move like that, I can do it
better." Hence, they will invest in the movement for themselves and not
simply replicate me. They will make the move their own. I want my work to be
invisible.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI run the website Acting Australia [http://www.actingaustralia.com.au]. This website is devoted to promoting and teaching the Australia film industry. I thought that it might perhaps interest you :)
Thanks!
Interesting read. So far I've only tried to give the technique in as clean movements as possible, asking my actors to interpret. Much like reading/learning a text and then playing around with it. Do you find your methods work better for the actors? Also, Scott, this is an old blog post. You should write more. It's interesting. :)
ReplyDeleteThe whole point of a line read in most cases is because the actor actually can't interpret... maybe we are saying the same thing? I guess I am referring to the actor who has trouble "playing around with it"... great thought though. Ok - trying to find time to write more!
DeleteHey buddy - have written heaps more now!!
Delete